saas · Aug 15, 2026
75/100 Strong
Scores higher than 88% of 1,391 multi-step funnels we have measured. Among the 1,074 saas funnels in that group, higher than 85%.
Measured by Roentgen 1.25.1 on 2026-08-15. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.
Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. Per device: desktop 75 · mobile 75.
Walk 429 links on the entry page, 406 walkable. 2 matched a funnel step; we captured 3 pages in all, this one included.
this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionsee their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionthe entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionTimothe AI | Your AI Marketing Agent for SEO and Growth
Hi, I'm Timothe, an AI marketing agent for solo founders, marketers, startup teams and all teams. I plan, write, and publish SEO content, with social media and more on the way.
Hi, I'm Timothe. I'm your AI marketing agent.
Built for teams that run on
Frequently asked questions
Thanks for reaching out
Product
Legal
Growth Calendar
Keyword Research
350+ free tools+5 more, not shown
OK
English
1x
2x
3x
4x
5x
Compare all plans
Which generative AI models do you use?
Do AI hallucinations occur?+2 more, not shown
$29
$59
$99
$0
structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionfree, $0/mo, $29/mo, $59/mo
Free$0
search, range, email, Tell us how we can help
trusted by
Which generative AI models do you use?
comparison grid: 39 rows
applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionAbsence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion6 of 15 measured checks need work2 could not be measured — not counted either way
Smallest body text is 10px (base ~11px). below the ~16px readable floor.
FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.
772 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
FixAdd aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.
14 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
FixDefer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.
15 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
“growth-calendar.webp” is 1440px wide, displayed at 360px
FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.
No <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
FixWrap the page in <header>, <main> and <footer> (or matching ARIA roles).
75 of 105 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
smallest: “Tools” at 36×20px
FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.
12 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.
type:1 form field relies on placeholder text as the only label.
FixBack placeholders with a real <label>. placeholder text vanishes on input.
a11y:2 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
FixStep heading levels one at a time; use CSS for size, not a deeper level.
a11y:2 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
FixMake the accessible name start with the visible label text.
a11y:124 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.
FixUse <button>/<a>, or add role + tabindex="0" and a key handler.
structure:At least 2.8 MB across 144 measurable resources, but 166 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
weight:Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Inline validation
which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted
deriveda deterministic summary generated only from measured facts. labeled, never an LLM guessComparison surface matches the Intent-Match pattern — measured comparison table plus comparison-intent copy
home: comparison grid: 39 rowscomparison copy
Compare LLM Tokenizers — ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini token counts. | Tools by Timothe AI
A match means this funnel's measurable surfaces fit the playbook's pattern — the quoted language is what fired the detection. A lever is one playbook mechanism observed on-page. We never claim what a brand's ads or emails do; a crawl can't see them. All funnel designs →
Two different things sit side by side here. The claim and its quoted evidence are measured on this funnel, the same way every other fact on this page is. The playbook itself is written guidance — our strategy library, not a measurement of this site — and it lives behind the links above. Nothing on this page recommends what this brand should do.
palette by on-page usage · type rendered live
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionBody copy in their text role, on a surface card.
Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.
layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionElements — the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text
We ran this pass on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.
