saas · Aug 9, 2026

project-genie.ai

50/100 Thin

Scores higher than 49% of 1,391 multi-step funnels we have measured. Among the 1,074 saas funnels in that group, higher than 38%.

How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.20.1 on 2026-08-09. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. Per device: desktop 50 · mobile 50.

Walk 20 links on the entry page, 16 walkable. 1 matched a funnel step; we captured 2 pages in all, this one included.

Captured Homepage / Lander
Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 2

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

2 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest
4 tactics
FAQFree trialLogo wallPricing tiers
Pricing
02

Pricing

▼ thinnest
3 tactics

$33.17 +11 more  ·  15% OFF  ·  1 proof point

Free trialLogo wallPricing tiers

In their own words

31 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
Project Genie | AI World Generator & 3D Environment Creator
Meta description
Project Genie - Transform text and images into infinite interactive 3D worlds instantly. Create, explore, and navigate AI-generated environments with real-time rendering.
Headline
Project Genie AI World Generation Platform
Section headings
Trusted by Creators WorldwideProject Genie FeaturesWhy Choose Project Genie?How Project Genie WorksProject Genie Use CasesWhat You Can Do on Project Genie TodayWhat Creators Say About Project GenieProject Genie FAQs+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links
What is Project Genie and how does it work?Is Project Genie available right now?What can I create on Project Genie today?What inputs does Project Genie support?How do the world models work?How does credit usage work?Can I explore worlds after generation?Can I keep worlds private or make them public?Do I need technical skills to use Project Genie?What is the relationship between Project Genie and Google?+2 more, not shown

Sections

4 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Hero section of project-genie.ai
Hero0% down the page
Logos section of project-genie.ai
Logos11% down the page
FAQ section of project-genie.ai
FAQ76% down the page
Footer section of project-genie.ai
Footer95% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Price anchor element
Price anchor“$39”

What we found

4 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Offer clarity1 of 1

Makes the pricing ladder explicit free, $250/mo

Action path1 of 4

Offers a free trial or free tier free credits

Trust & proof1 of 2

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim trusted by

Friction reduction2 of 2

Answers buyer objections Project Genie FAQs
Offers a free trial or free tier also shown under Action path

What we didn’t find

7 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see7 of 11 applicable

Press / "as seen in" 508 of the 1,960 funnels we checked
Demo / docs entry 477 of the 1,393 funnels we checked
Lead-capture form 342 of the 1,393 funnels we checked
Us-vs-them comparison 332 of the 1,968 funnels we checked
Proof above the fold 314 of the 1,968 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 237 of the 1,539 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 101 of the 1,960 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

13 run · 7 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

7 of 13 measured checks need work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

contrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

67% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 86% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

worst: “15% OFF” at 1:1 (12px, #ffffff on #ffffff). needs 4.5:1

FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 12px (base ~18px). below the ~16px readable floor.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Named controls

a11y:named-controls

2 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

FixAdd aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.

Page weight

weight:page-weight

At least 6.5 MB across 110 measurable resources. 48 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

FixCompress and lazy-load below-the-fold media; drop unused third-party scripts.

Render-blocking resources

weight:render-blocking-resources

9 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

FixDefer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

Oversized images

weight:oversized-images

6 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“1.jpg” is 2394px wide, displayed at 500px

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

52 of 66 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Monthly” at 79×32px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing3

Line length

5 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length
Landmark regions

No <main> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

FixWrap the page in <header>, <main> and <footer> (or matching ARIA roles).

structure:landmark-regions

Clear3

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#faf9f7
accent#faf9f7
bg#faf9f7
surface#faf9f7
text#0a0a0a
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox72px
Jumps over the lazy dog48px
A subheading in their voice36px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
12pxAa
14pxAa
16pxAa
18pxAa
36pxAa
48pxAa
72pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
Aa700
FAMILIES
Gilda Display · Inter
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

1 of 9 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran this pass on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

X-ray a funnel

Your competitor's funnel is one URL away.

Give your AI real references · Measured facts, not taste

Similar crawls