saas · Aug 15, 2026

interviewscreener.com

60/100 Partial

Scores higher than 66% of 1,391 multi-step funnels we have measured. Among the 1,074 saas funnels in that group, higher than 58%.

How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.25.1 on 2026-08-15. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. Per device: desktop 60 · mobile 60.

Walk 26 links on the entry page, 18 walkable. 3 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

Captured Homepage / Lander
Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 4

What we recorded

Progress

2 scans

this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Unchanged across 2 scans Same 5 conversion tactics detected since 2026-08-09.
  1. 5 tactics 2026-08-09
  2. 5 tactics 2026-08-15

The funnel, frame by frame

4 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

5 tactics

$0.0053 +11 more  ·  subscription

Sticky CTAFAQFree trialLogo wallDemo / docs
Pricing
02

Pricing

▲ strongest
6 tactics

$49.99 +18 more

Sticky CTAFAQFree trialLogo wallPricing tiersDemo / docs
Product
03

Product

▼ thinnest
5 tactics
Sticky CTAFAQFree trialLogo wallDemo / docs
Solutions
04

Solutions

6 tactics

$4,700 +10 more  ·  subscription

Sticky CTAFAQFree trialLogo wallPricing tiersDemo / docs

In their own words

43 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
Interview Screener – AI Hiring Software to Save Time & Money
Meta description
Interview Screener is the AI-based recruitment platform that screens resumes, conducts interviews in 10 languages, and tracks every candidate – all in one place, at a fraction of the cost.
Headline
All-in-One AI Based Recruitment Platform
Section headings
The AI Hiring Software That Makes Every Hire Smarter, Faster, And CheaperHiring Is Broken. Here's What We Fix.How Interview Screener Automates Your Hiring WorkflowTalk to Our InterviewerAsk AI About UsOne Artificial Intelligence Recruitment SoftwareSee Exactly What You'll PayHear It From the People Who Use It+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links
ProductSolutionsCompanyResourcesGet StartedToo many CVs. Too little time.Candidates cheat. You never know who is real.Bias and legal exposure are rising fast.Days lost per hire just to schedule a single interview.Your hiring stack is broken and costing you time.+2 more, not shown
Prices on the page
$0.0053$0.0427$213.51$0.0851$0.0482$0.1333$266.53$480.05+4 more, not shown

Sections

5 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Nav section of interviewscreener.com
Nav0% down the page
Hero section of interviewscreener.com
Hero0% down the page
Logos section of interviewscreener.com
Logos33% down the page
FAQ section of interviewscreener.com
FAQ75% down the page
Footer section of interviewscreener.com
Footer94% down the page

What we found

5 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Offer clarity1 of 1

Makes the pricing ladder explicit $49.99/mo, free, $99.99/mo, $299.99/mo

Action path2 of 4

Offers a free trial or free tier Start Free
Offers a demo or docs entry point Book a Demo

Trust & proof1 of 2

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim trusted by

Friction reduction2 of 2

Answers buyer objections Frequently Asked Questions
Offers a free trial or free tier also shown under Action path

What we didn’t find

6 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see6 of 11 applicable

Press / "as seen in" 508 of the 1,960 funnels we checked
Lead-capture form 342 of the 1,393 funnels we checked
Us-vs-them comparison 332 of the 1,968 funnels we checked
Proof above the fold 314 of the 1,968 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 237 of the 1,539 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 101 of the 1,960 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

11 run · 5 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

5 of 11 measured checks need work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

contrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

89% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “Log in” at 1.06:1 (14px, #ffffff on #f8f8f8). needs 4.5:1

FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 10px (base ~16px). below the ~16px readable floor.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Page weight

weight:page-weight

At least 16.0 MB across 366 measurable resources. 189 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

FixCompress and lazy-load below-the-fold media; drop unused third-party scripts.

Render-blocking resources

weight:render-blocking-resources

20 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

FixDefer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

153 of 218 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Toggle menu” at 40×40px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing3

Line length

29 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length
Heading levels

4 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

FixStep heading levels one at a time; use CSS for size, not a deeper level.

a11y:heading-levels

Clear3

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#2d7cfe
accent#2d7cfe
bg#ffffff
surface#f8f8f8
text#6b7280
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox52px
Jumps over the lazy dog36px
A subheading in their voice24px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
12pxAa
14pxAa
16pxAa
18pxAa
20pxAa
22pxAa
24pxAa
36pxAa
52pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
Aa700
FAMILIES
helveticaNow
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

2 of 10 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Elements — the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran these passes on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

X-ray a funnel

Your competitor's funnel is one URL away.

Give your AI real references · Measured facts, not taste

Similar crawls